WEBVTT

00:01.030 --> 00:07.950
Welcome to target every 20 2020 today will be focusing on tax completion with all blessings

00:11.480 --> 00:19.030
the phrase that we will be looking at those methodologies as you can see in the question.

00:19.230 --> 00:24.660
The question reads since there are significant dash in the flawed methodologies of the studies upon

00:24.660 --> 00:26.010
which it is based.

00:26.010 --> 00:28.110
The media analysis is anything but.

00:28.110 --> 00:35.730
DASH So in questions like these you know that there are two blanks to be filled and there will be a

00:35.730 --> 00:39.640
correlation between the two words that you will be selecting.

00:39.780 --> 00:44.900
It can either be a positive correlation or a negative correlation in this question.

00:44.910 --> 00:52.080
We see that there is a positive correlation which means that whatever you fill in the blank no one will

00:52.080 --> 00:53.670
be positively relieved.

00:53.670 --> 00:58.200
It is a positive word in bland no one there will be a positive word in blank number two and if it is

00:58.200 --> 01:00.680
a negative word in line number two.

01:00.690 --> 01:05.530
Then there will be a negative word in black number one.

01:05.770 --> 01:09.040
Now the phrase that you are to focus on as Florida methodologies

01:11.980 --> 01:17.480
the researcher has used certain flawed methodologies in his studies.

01:17.600 --> 01:18.520
No.

01:18.600 --> 01:24.890
The first blank relates to this flawed methodologies and flawed methodologies would obviously lead to

01:24.890 --> 01:29.030
inconsistencies so in questions like this.

01:29.030 --> 01:35.660
You have to come up with a word of your own that you think fills the blank correctly and then look at

01:35.660 --> 01:41.770
your options to find a similar word here for the first blank we're looking at a word that is similar

01:41.770 --> 01:47.300
to inconsistencies and thus consistency is cannot be your answer.

01:47.330 --> 01:57.430
So that option is eliminated for the first option number three is eliminated no subtleties kind of means

01:57.430 --> 02:04.280
the same thing as consistencies or any degree D and thus that can also not be your answer.

02:04.420 --> 02:13.750
Since it is a positive word and thus you have left it irregularities which is our answer now for the

02:13.750 --> 02:14.630
second blank.

02:14.740 --> 02:25.120
It says the analysis is anything but dash anything but is a phrase that performs the function of not.

02:25.570 --> 02:33.730
Which means if you want to if you have a negative word in the blank anything but makes it a positive

02:33.730 --> 02:42.310
phrase similarly if you have a positive word in the blank anything but will make it negative.

02:43.480 --> 02:49.450
Now the combined phrase of anything but and the word and the second blank should give us something that

02:49.450 --> 02:56.290
is positively correlated to irregularities which means we are looking for a positive word in the second

02:56.290 --> 02:58.860
blank now.

02:58.890 --> 03:00.780
Unreliable is not a positive word.

03:01.960 --> 03:10.750
Thus we can eliminated how we have come into this conclusion is that flawed methodologies will lead

03:10.750 --> 03:12.790
to unreliable results.

03:12.820 --> 03:20.150
So if you write anything but unreliable it means that the result is reliable that cannot be the case

03:20.240 --> 03:20.900
in this question.

03:22.370 --> 03:26.210
Thus we are left with two words intelligible and credible.

03:28.830 --> 03:37.160
No credible is the most appropriate fit because we are talking of research studies and the credibility

03:37.160 --> 03:48.350
of it is dependent on the methodology is used and thus we select that going on to the next question.

03:50.770 --> 03:52.980
The word that we are focusing on is elaborate

03:55.790 --> 04:02.210
unable to eschew her well-known tendency towards bash the speaker effectively returned a few minute

04:02.210 --> 04:04.450
policy and do an hour long discussion

04:07.820 --> 04:08.990
bash on its history

04:12.250 --> 04:13.250
so here.

04:13.300 --> 04:21.450
The speaker has a tendency to speak aloud since she has converted a five minute discussion into an hour

04:21.450 --> 04:32.900
long talk thus she is elaborate in using her words and therefore we are looking at words which signify

04:33.050 --> 04:37.470
elaborate or going on for a long time

04:41.040 --> 04:51.440
so the second word which is going to fill the second blank is a word that should describe the expansion

04:51.440 --> 04:54.490
of a few minutes into an hour long discussion.

04:54.530 --> 05:02.660
If you look at your options expatriation which means the expansion in due of something small into something

05:02.660 --> 05:04.780
big is the word that we are looking for

05:10.160 --> 05:21.140
this tension is also a similar word but it is used in medical contexts so that is the mood repertory

05:21.260 --> 05:23.260
is not the word that we are looking for.

05:23.360 --> 05:28.310
Since we have already concluded that expatriation fits the second blank appropriately

05:31.220 --> 05:32.960
now moving onto the first blank

05:36.820 --> 05:45.070
the speaker has been elaborate as you can see from the second part of the question and thus elaboration

05:45.130 --> 05:55.150
is clearly our answer because the speaker is not precise the speaker is you cannot say that he is imprecise

05:55.270 --> 06:03.130
he might be precise but he is not concise he is elaborate thus that is not a position cannot be answered

06:04.840 --> 06:05.480
and does.

06:05.500 --> 06:09.920
This also does not fit the tenets of the sentence so that is removed.

06:10.030 --> 06:17.110
Thus our ancestors elaboration and expatriation moving on to the next question.

06:17.420 --> 06:25.170
The word that we'll focus on is interest the question reads although this historical figure had been

06:25.170 --> 06:32.160
a dash politician and a brilliant inventor the professor found herself unable to dash the interest of

06:32.160 --> 06:38.260
other students in the category of a man with such outdated views.

06:38.400 --> 06:45.880
Now we know that he is a brilliant inventor and thus it is likely that the first word that fills the

06:45.880 --> 06:57.070
first blank is also a positive word thus it is unlikely that the first word is insipid or effete both

06:57.070 --> 07:05.450
of which have negative connotations since he is a brilliant inventor it is likely that he is also described

07:05.450 --> 07:13.370
using a positive word in terms of his politics and thus deaf is our answer.

07:17.130 --> 07:22.810
Now for the second blank the professor found itself unable to dash the interest of the student.

07:23.460 --> 07:34.390
We are looking for a word that is similar to evoke so grew and that are two options that we have which

07:34.400 --> 07:40.710
are similar doubt cannot be an option and that is eliminated because that is not about accumulating

07:40.710 --> 07:54.620
interests not at grew and that the difference between them is that it is a much faster accrual so instead

07:54.620 --> 08:06.150
of using just accrue because this is about a dog actual being a slow process we eliminate that word

08:07.360 --> 08:15.070
and thus we are left with that which is our answer.

08:15.220 --> 08:17.770
That brings us to the end of this video.

08:19.350 --> 08:25.640
On tech's completion with two blanks they are doing for them all to be videos so that you can correct

08:25.640 --> 08:26.930
diary like all of us

08:30.090 --> 08:31.570
please Like Share and subscribe.
