So let's get started.
Okay.
So here is practice one.
Our first question in red.
Some people think that government should increase the costs of fuel for cars and other vehicles to solve
environmental problems.
Do you agree or disagree?
Our second question.
We can access information from the Internet easily.
Some people say that libraries are no longer necessary.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
So I want you to pause the lecture.
Pause the lecture, get out a timer, set that timer for maybe a minute and try to answer all parts
of the analysis.
So pause the lecture now before I go to the next screen and give you the results.
Okay.
So let's look at the analysis.
For our first question in red, the general essay topic is about the environment.
The restrictive or limiting words relates to government increasing fuel costs to solve the problem.
Our direction words are agree or disagree and we have one part.
We only have one part because either you agree or disagree.
Not both.
If you agree, your entire essay is about why you agree.
If you disagree, your entire essay is about why you disagree.
For our second question, the general essay topic libraries.
The restrictive language is that it's not necessary due to the internet is not necessary.
No longer necessary.
Our direction.
Words are to what extent?
Agree or disagree.
This can have 1 to 2 parts because you may mainly agree, but there may be some aspect that you disagree
with.
So our first question is different than the second question, because it uses the language to what extent.
So how do students mess up these questions for the first one in red?
The main way students mess up the question is by discussing a solution other than increasing the cost
of fuel for cars, you are limited.
You are restricted to only talking about that aspect, only writing about that aspect.
For our second part, our second question how do students mess it up?
The main way is by having a separate discussion about how we can access the Internet more easily.
Why is it important to access the Internet more easily?
Well, we can find by by by accessing the Internet more easily.
That's not what the question is about.
The question is about our libraries necessary steel.
That's what the question is about.
Okay.
Let's move on to class practice two.
Here are our two questions.
On the left in red.
Many people today put personal information online for the needs of daily life shopping, banking, social
life.
Is this a positive or negative development?
Question two Nowadays, many people choose to be self employed rather than work for a company or organization.
Why might this be the case?
What could be the disadvantages of being self employed?
All right, go ahead.
Stop the lecture.
Pause for a minute or a minute and 30 seconds and do your question analysis.
Pause the lecture.
All right.
So for our first question in red, the general topic is online Internet, our restrictive language,
sharing personal information for daily life, direction, words, positive or negative?
One part second question the general essay topic is the work world or employment.
The restrictive language is we're only talking about self employment, choosing self employment our
direction.
Words are why is it happening and what are the disadvantages?
There are two parts here, two parts.
The first one is one part.
If it's positive, you only write about it being positive.
If it's negative, you only write about it being negative.
Now, how do students mess up these questions?
The first one in red.
The main way is by failing to understand that you must make a clear choice.
Write not positive and negative.
Make a choice.
Another way is by talking about information not related to personal life or daily needs.
For our second question, students lower their scores by having some discussion or writing about working
for companies or working for organizations, or why people work for organizations and companies.
That's not the focus of the question.
The focus is on the growth of self employment.
Also, you have to make sure that you answer both parts.
Not just answer why, but also talking about the disadvantages.
One of the ways that I don't have ridden here in terms of really messing up that second question would
be having a discussion about advantages.
Did they ask you about advantages?
No.
So you would not write about advantages at all?
All right, let's go to class analysis.
Practice three.
Here are our two questions.
Question one Nowadays, more and more task at home and work are performed by robots.
Why do you think this is happening?
Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
Question two Many doctors recommend that older people exercise regularly, but most older people do
not follow any exercise routine.
Why do you think this is happening?
How can these people be encouraged to exercise regularly?
So everyone pause the lecture, take a minute to a minute, 30 seconds, and do your full question analysis.
Okay.
Let's take a look.
For the first one.
The general essay topic is about robots.
The limiting language home and work task.
That's all we're talking about in terms of robots, instruction, words wise, it happening and also
talking about advantages outweighing disadvantages.
Our second one is about the general topic could be about the elderly.
You also could have maybe the general essay topic being about physical exercise.
That would be a way of looking at it also.
However, whether you look at the general essay topic being about the elderly or the general essay topic
being about physical exercise, the restricting limiting language does not change.
The restrictive limiting language is which is so important because that's what you're writing about,
is that older people don't follow a regular exercise routine.
Our instruction words are why and how to encourage it.
This has two parts.
Our first our first question has two parts.
So how does students mess up this question?
Students mainly louse up the question by only discussing robots in home or only writing about robots
and work.
There are two parts here.
You have to talk about them at home and also at work.
Of course, you're going to get a bad score if you only address part of the question.
Sometimes students mess up by not understanding what the word task means.
Another way that they mess up this question is not talking about how advantages outweigh disadvantages,
or if the advantages outweigh keyword is outweigh.
You can't just say.
These are some of the advantages, these are some of the disadvantages and not have a discussion about
whether or not the advantages outweigh outweigh the disadvantages for our for our second question.
If you're writing about why doctors recommend the elderly exercise, you're wrong.
If you talk about the benefits of exercise for the elderly, you're wrong.
You're talking about why they don't follow a routine and how can you motivate them to follow a routine?
That is the limitation of the question.
You cannot go outside of that box.
Okay.
Question analysis class practice for let's get into it.
We have three questions in front of us.
Question one in red.
Some people believe that in the next 100 years, most people will have a better life while others disagree.
What is your opinion?
Question two Some people say that rich people are the most successful in society.
Others think that those who contribute to society, like scientists and teachers, are more successful.
Discuss both sides and give your opinion.
Question three and white.
Nowadays, many people prefer to seek medical advice on the Internet instead of seeking a qualified
doctor.
What are the reasons for it?
Is it a positive or negative development?
So pause the lecture.
Take a couple of minutes and do a full analysis for each question.
So for our first question in red, the general topic is the future.
Our restrictive language are the next 100 years better for personal life.
This is an opinion question.
There's only one part.
Body one is your opinion.
Body two is your opinion.
They're not separate parts here.
Our second question, the general topic is about success and people.
The restrictive language rich people, scientists, teachers, our direction words both sides and give
an opinion.
Three parts here.
Our third question general essay topic is medicine.
The restrictive language Internet advice over qualified doctors choosing.
Our direction words.
What are the reasons?
Is it positive or negative?
There are two question parts here.
Now.
How do students mess up or bobble this question?
For the first one, the only real way you can bobble this question is by talking about maybe modern
life and people liking modern life or talking about the past or comparing the future in the past.
Your job is to put yourself in the future.
Put yourself in the future and talking about whether or not people are going to have a better life,
whether or not they're going to have a better life.
Also, a student can really mess up this first question in red by not using future tense verbs, not
using future tense language.
That's a great way or really a poor way that a student will mess up.
The question for our second one.
Of course, not having a balanced discussion first explaining about rich people, then explaining about
success for teachers and scientists, and then having a clear opinion.
Having clear paragraphs is so important to scoring well.
For our third question, misunderstanding what it refers to.
Very often students misunderstand reference pronouns.
In addition, this question is not about why you should seek the advice of a qualified doctor or why
qualified doctors are better.
That's not what it's about.
You must only talk about why people are seeking advice on the Internet instead of a qualified doctor.