If I don't understand a word, then you have a problem.
CFA If you don't understand a word and the question, you've got a problem.
I don't know what I can't.
I can't tell you what to do.
You may end up writing.
You may end up writing off topic.
That's the reason why I mentioned outlining.
Right.
There's there's no reason why.
There is no reason why.
Before you take this exam, you haven't gone over and looked at every question they have asked over
the past two years.
Even if you're just reading through the questions and saying, okay, this question, I don't understand.
Let me put this aside.
And then the next 15 questions.
Maybe you understand next question.
I don't understand this question.
We put this question aside, review and outline questions.
Review and outline questions.
Right?
Yeah.
Yeah, I've said.
I've said several collocations already.
Moon inspired, blasted off.
Right culture changing aspirations.
Those are all slightly amended.
Collocations are words, words, words put combinations of words put together properly successful lunar
journey.
That's the collocation.
Right combinations of words that are put together properly.
There are a lot of YouTube videos, free information, guys on on Collocations.
If you need more information on that, there's a lot more.
All right.
I'm about to move on.
Faye.
I just told the last young lady the same thing.
I'm going to tell you, if you have this problem right now, make sure that you have gone over and outlined
100 essay questions.
I promise you, if you review an outline, 100 essay questions that they've asked over the past two
years, you won't have this problem.
Och, you won't have that problem of not having information to talk about or not knowing the topic.
All right.
So let's talk about the advantages and disadvantages question with opinion or outweigh.
Right with opinion or outweigh.
I'm going to go over this.
All right.
So with an advantage or disadvantage question, you know, you could see, like I told you before,
if a question is talking about outweigh that's normally going to fall under academic if a question is
saying give your opinion discuss the advantages and disadvantages, give your opinion, you see that
much more likely with the general exam.
The alternative method that I'm going to show you for writing this question is the same for both.
All right.
But giving your opinion is not the same thing as do.
Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
It's not the same thing.
Okay.
So some mistakes that you should avoid.
Only listing advantages or only listing disadvantages?
Right with this kind of question, you cannot only list advantages or only this disadvantages.
That is one way of messing up your question, putting the opinion or putting how it outweighs as the
conclusion.
I've said it before.
You cannot do that.
Not clearly expressing the factor of outweigh.
Right.
A lot of times when people take this question, they don't really address the they don't really use
language that expresses how much you know, how much the advantages outweigh the disadvantages, or
they don't clearly express their opinion.
They'll just say, these are the advantages, these are the disadvantages.
And then they'll try to put one sentence to put put an opinion in the conclusion.
And people don't realize how much they're messing up their scores by by doing that.
You have to be able to clearly express an opinion.
You have to clearly express a factor of outweigh.
I just talked about this one, just discussing advantages and disadvantages and also bad sequencing
or illogical structure, you know, having just bad essay structure, paragraph structure.
You want to you've got to have proper sequencing, proper paragraph.
And when you're writing.
So let's take a look at a question, an example.
We have these two formats.
We have the traditional format.
You can do it, like I said, and you can do it like discuss the advantages.
Discuss the disadvantages.
Body three Give your opinion.
It's perfectly fine.
Or you can have an alternative format, which is what I'm going to show you today, which is body one,
discuss the advantages, point out the advantages, and then give your opinion about the advantages
then body to point out the disadvantages.
Give your opinion on the disadvantages.
That's that's an alternative way of structuring it.
This is a four paragraph structure.
This is a five paragraph structure.
And the same goes with without way.
This, this, everyone.
This should be changed here.
Discuss the advantages.
Discuss the disadvantages.
Body three would not be your opinion.
Just.
Just to be clear, body three would be your explanation of how much.
If the advantages outweigh the disadvantages, that's what Body three is.
Body three is your explanation of if the advantages outweigh the disadvantages.
That's what body three is here is not.
It shouldn't be opinion.
Right?
That's my mistake.
That should say that should be about expressing if the advantages outweigh the disadvantages.
That's what that is.
The alternative format is four paragraphs.
And here when you talk about this word outweigh.
Right.
We talk about this word outweigh what in your mind?
I'm just going to ask this question in general and let me know what you think in your mind when you
when you hear the word outweigh.
Right.
When they say do the advantages outweigh or do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
What does that word mean?
What are they asking you when they say outweigh?
Heavier.
Standing off in the crowd heavier.
Not.
It's not really different.
Yeah.
Outweigh.
Outweigh means.
Outweigh.
Really?
It doesn't mean to what extent you disagree.
Okay, everybody, please stop.
It doesn't mean to what extent you disagree.
Also, it doesn't necessarily mean more advantages or more disadvantages.
It doesn't necessarily mean more advantages or more disadvantage something because conceivably two disadvantages
could carry more weight to disadvantages can be more important than three advantages.
So really, it's talking about which is more important, which carries more weight, which is more significant.
That's that's really what that word is asking you.
So if you're not clear, if you're not clear on what that word means, then that's how maybe you might
you might be hurting.
That's how you might be hurting your task achievement score.
You have to understand what that word means.
So here in this situation, in this question, this person is going to favor the advantages, meaning
they're going to say the advantages are more important than the disadvantages.
The advantages are more significant than the disadvantages.
The advantages carry more weight than the disadvantages.
The first body paragraph body is actually body one and body two.
I reverse that.
You're going to discuss the disadvantages and then explain why they are not more important.
And then in the next body paragraph, you're going to discuss the advantages and discuss why they are
more important.
That's what you're doing.
You're discussing and explaining why they are not more important or why they are more important.
That's what it means to outweigh.
Question.
Pablo, we we do decide.
What do you mean?
I don't understand, Pablo.
What do you mean?
What do you mean, Pablo?
Do we?
Yeah, you.
You.
It's your decision, Pablo.
You have to decide if the advantage.
If the advantages outweigh the disadvantages.
That's up to you.
Yes.
Our way means more significant.
More important.
I mean, there's bias in everything.
No, no one is unbiased.
All right.
Here's the question.
This talking about advantages and disadvantages.
Please hold your questions.
Everybody, please hold your questions.
I mentioned the very beginning.
I'm going to upload.
I'm going if I already mentioned earlier about the course being uploaded or the lecture being uploaded
in the course, please hold your questions.
All right.
So this is a question the world should have only one world.
The the world should have only one government rather than a national government for each country.
Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages?
Do the advantages of this are the advantages of having a one world government more important or more
significant?
Right.
Then the disadvantages.
That's how you have to think about this question.
I see so many people mess up this question by just saying these are the advantages, these are the disadvantages,
and they don't explain about outweigh.
Right.
So you start with an introduction.
The language the language that you see in a different color, I guess that color is peach.
The language you see in a different color is just showing you range.
Right.
You're showing range and elected one world government.
Cosmos ocracy empower international body one governmental roof.
This is saying the same thing a different way.
That's what it means by range.
If you're writing and you keep saying one world government, one world government, one world government,
one world government, one world government, one world government.
Right.
You're not showing any rage.
Okay.
Unlike the UN, an elected One World government exists beyond an advisory role and embodies final global
authority in all matters.
Some declare this cosmic ocracy inevitable, which begs whether, if such an empowered international
body exists, the benefits outweigh the drawbacks.
We get the question.
This essay sets forth that far more upside exists if humanity amalgamate under one governmental roof.
That's an introduction.
Three sentences.
It doesn't matter the question.
It's always the same.
What is the what is the what is the general topic?
What is the question you have to address?
What is the position that it's going to take and talk about?
That's what you have to do.
All right, I'll address two things right now.
Then please hold your questions.
The topics these topics are topics from the actual exam.
All right.
I'm not making stuff up.
I'm not making up stuff.
These are real exam questions.
Right now, the first thing I'm writing about are the disadvantages and explaining why the disadvantages
are not more important.
Right.
When you read the first sentence.
When you read the first sentence, you get you already get you already get the writer's position.
About if the advantages outweigh the disadvantages you get this right away if you potential downsides
the world government exists but not in a measure of importance more than the positives.
One pitfall suggests that the wealthiest powerbrokers will control a one world entity with an iron fist
of corruption and selfishness.
However, this possibility presents no difference to the to the current state of the world outside of
wealth control.
An additional argument, West rests with eliminating voting and founding global tyranny.
Be that as it may, has the right to vote led to improving the world's problems?
No, it has not.
And the reasons centered on a lack of authority to act globally.
Right.
So in this paragraph, the writer is giving you.
The rider is giving you what the disadvantages are, but they're also telling you why these why these
disadvantages are not more important.
They're telling you why they're not more important.
Then we have the paragraph where we're talking about the advantages.
Hold on 1/2.
I have to take care of something.
Somebody is making a mistake.
And putting a.
Annotation on my screen.
All right.
Now we have a vantage, just paragraph.
After dismissing the disadvantages, examining the advantages reveals overpowering favour.
Again, you get the authors position that they outweigh.
The position must be clear.
First, a singly authorized leadership could offer more controlled disarmament of of all the life ending
weapons currently held by unstable madmen.
This consideration holds significant importance because human society has faced the brink of ultimate
destruction from various voted on tyrannical leaderships.
Right now, the reason why this is in red and this is in red is I'm pointing out something about coherence.
I talked about this in the first paragraph, body paragraph, and I talked about it again in the second
body paragraph.
I'm making a link and I'm writing coherently.
Besides controlled disarmament, globalized decision making accelerates various industries outer space,
global pandemics, environmental laws, and easing territorial disputes.
The world screams across the currently the current global controlled social media network for these
societal upgrades and immediately sanctioning global administration pushes this agenda forward.
The arguments mentioned above edge out any declaration of drawbacks presenting a stronger position.
When you read these two body paragraphs, you are very clear that the writer.
Feels that the advantages outweigh the disadvantages, that the advantages are more significant than
the disadvantages.
This is called answering the question.
Right.
If I just talk about the advantages and talk about the disadvantages, I'm not answering the question.
Again, that language you see in peach authorized leadership, decision making, globalize decision
making, global administration.
Again, that's showing range.
The language in blue is showing you about transitions and coherence.
Right.
When I say outside of wolf control, that means I'm leaving the previous detail I was talking about
and coming into another one.
After first this.
Besides, these are all types of coherent language.
Right.
And also the way I started off this this second this second body paragraph, I'm connecting to the previous
body paragraph and leading into the next idea.
So all of this is what coherence is.
This is what coherence means.
The language in Orange is how you know the position of the author, how you know the position of the
author.
And then I'm sorry, we have a conclusion.
I put the conclusion.
Many citizens fear a global government, but most fear change until they experience it.
Remember the fears of switching from kingship to democracy, and now it's time to take the next step
from scattered democracies to one world government.
The idealistic world of Star Trek is achievable if we achieve this new path.
Now, let me be clear.
I don't want you all to take away from this and say, Oh, Mr. Campbell wants us to have a one world
government.
He wants to.
He wants to destroy governance, governance and politics.
No, it doesn't.
Being able to write about a topic, being able to express a point of view on a topic doesn't necessarily
mean you agree with it.
Sometimes one side is easier.
To right then the other side.
If I have an essay question, if I have an essay question and I'm taking a test, I don't care about
what I really agree with.
I'm going to pick what's easier for me to write about.
That's what I'm going to do.
I'm going to pick what's easier for me to write about, so don't get caught up into.
I have to really.
You know, it's about what I believe.
No, no, no.
It's about what's easiest to write about.